Author’s Log: #IWSG and Perspective

0038crhcOr, Insecure Writer and the Undercooked Supporting Character

When last we blogged about Writer Insecurities, we lamented over the ups and downs of the writing life. In the meantime I’ve watched Gordon Ramsay’s Best Restaurants on ye old Netflix, which turns out to be one of the best things I could have done this early in my professional writing career. Also, it turns out, one of the more uncomfortable.

Let me set the scene: Being in Round 1 of editorial revisions (pre-contract) for Keepers #2, both Editor Awesome and the Stunt Monkey have pointed out my essentially flat hero, especially when paired with my more colorful heroine. As I respect and adore both parties in this equation, I was forced to have to face a rather unfortunate home truth–while my heroes tend to be layered and flawed, my romantic interests aren’t quite as nuanced as they should be. In other words, I’m not giving my readers a chance to truly know and care about them. This isn’t gender specific–I recently experienced the same problems with Big Dang Projeckt.

So I had to turn around and face the issue head-on. (I’m Irish–“fight” is my default setting, kinda like the Hulk.) This is what I do. As artists and craft-monkeys, this is what we all have to do. Why? I wondered. Why do I have such an issue with conflict when it comes to romance?

There could be a couple of things. First, there was a decided lack of drama in my own whirlwind romance with the Tech Monkey. We’re in lockstep probably 90-95% of the time and neither of us has any patience with unneccessary shenanigans. Life is too short to waste time not communicating with your life partner, we feel. The closest we came to kids was Ninja Katz, and that suits us fine. Second, too often (I’ve found) romantical complications in books, TV, and movies equates to aforementioned shenanigans and, unfortunately, ANGST.

Angst has its place, don’t get me wrong. But sometimes it gets so silly that it’s exhausting. I know I hate it when a hero panders to a romantic interest so unlikeable I want to smack both parties, especially when hero is otherwise competent and there’s a better romantic interest on the horizon (it was this very scenario that inspired Big Dang Projeckt). So I’m trying to keep away from melodrama, probably by going to the other extreme. It’s difficult enough to fully develop a loving relationship between two people within a novella setting (on the cusp of the apocalypse, no less). But if my readers are going to fall in love with my characters, they have to be able to get to know them first.

Which brings me to Gordon Ramsay. In this show, he pits two restaurants of the same ethnic cuisine against each other as the “Best Restaurant” of that cuisine in the UK. In the first episode (Italian), the chefs were a team of brothers whose management side is run by their parents. The lads were incredibly bold and experiemental and ridiculously talented, but Mom, as Front of House, defended her boys against customers at every turn and only gave them the “good” feedback, loathe to hurt their feelings. Gordon eventually helped them to see that they’ll never get better without the bad and occasionally ugly–if plates are coming back with the same feedback (heh), it’s probably true, and needs to be fixed. Gordon, for example, ONLY wants to hear the bad, because that’s how he learns, and improves.

Creative types have to be incredibly brave. Not only do we have to put ourselves on the spot with every word written, every word edited, and every manuscript submitted, but we have to face criticsm as professionals. It’s tempting to only want to hear the good, but we’re not going to improve and develop without the rest as well. The trick is in knowing–and respecting the craft of writing enough-to accept true feedback for what it is and implement a plan to fix it.

So I’m reworking my hero’s profile for Keepers #2, and have already (I dearly hope) fixed the issue with Big Dang Projeckt. But now that I’ve accept the issue as something that needs addressing, if I do my homework in future I can forgo the problem altogether, and be the better writer for it.

IWSG

Advertisements

9 thoughts on “Author’s Log: #IWSG and Perspective

  1. David Stringer says:

    I’m a bit similar – I don’t like the ridiculous side of melodrama, but I think in my efforts to avoid it, my stuff can end up quite dull.

    It can be tough to strike the right balance!

    1. catemorgan says:

      You said it, David–there’s a line between flat and clarity/subtext I need to mark on the writer’s map. Probably with “Here Be Dragons”.

      Thanks for stopping by! 🙂

  2. Shah Wharton says:

    Dang it – I forgot my IWSG post! ARRGH! My life is over! Okay – hyperbole has its place, but a more tempered approach is best for a novel, I agree. But I really did forget my post – and I really am a bit scared of the wrath of Alex! X

  3. cluculzwriter says:

    I love my characters, which is why it feels so devastating when my critique partners don’t. At first I fight it and assume they’re off. Eventually, I finally give in, make a change here, a change there, and voila, perfection. Haha, not quite, but they turned out to have concrete ideas about what was wrong with my oh-so-perfect characters.

    Handling criticism has never been easy for me, but it’s become something I thrive on.

    1. catemorgan says:

      Stephen King says we should always be prepared to “Kill our darlings” (ironically from the man with the fifty-pound tomes), and going back to the drawing board is never easy, especially when you think you’re done. Once I get past the initial sting, I can generally return to the work with gusto–USUALLY. 😉

  4. Gus Sanchez says:

    I was talking about the same thing in my blog today – accepting bad criticism in order to make your work stronger – and I very much agree that the best feedback you can get regarding your work is negative criticism. Sometimes you have to tell your fellow writer that subplot he’s enamored with just isn’t working, for reasons X, Y, and Z. Not because that person’s a bad writer, but because that person’s a good writer getting stuck.

    Excellent post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s